HSREP Roundtable № 01

Does the platform decide who hears the argument?

Season 1 found that platform, not content, decides who sees a health argument — the same piece routed to opposite audiences on Facebook and LinkedIn. This roundtable puts that finding to professionals.

§ 01 · The guiding questions

Three questions. Your name on the record.

Q1
Does it match your experience? In your setting, does platform choice change who actually receives health evidence — and have you seen it?
Q2
What would you do differently? If platform routing is real, how should a practitioner or institution disseminate evidence to reach the intended audience?
Q3
Where is the risk? What’s the danger of optimizing for platform reach — and how do we avoid distorting the evidence to fit the channel?
§ 02 · How it works

Low friction to join. High standard for the record.

Open · 14 days
Respond

Answer with your real name and affiliation through one short form. A named moderator curates.

On close
Synthesis

When the window ends, responses are reviewed and a single published synthesis names consented contributors and the through-line.

After
The record

The question, the synthesis, and any resulting advocacy brief become a permanent, citable page.

§ 03 · Synthesis & record

The published record.

Contributors and responses are published only when real, consented, and attributable — never estimated. Until the window closes and responses are reviewed, this record stays empty by design.